<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.guildsomm.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Greg Harrington</title><link>https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:41:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh" /><item><title>Theoretical Wine Cost</title><link>https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh/posts/theoretical-wine-cost</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8277e151-5ba9-4335-93f0-6f497ffb8dc4:e675bca1-7429-4676-abd5-04e0f0178aee</guid><dc:creator>Gramercy Cellars</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=7082</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh/posts/theoretical-wine-cost#comments</comments><description>&lt;p style="text-align:left;" align="center"&gt;How well are you performing in your role as wine manager?&amp;nbsp; The owner wants 29% cost and you hit it every month.&amp;nbsp; But so what?&amp;nbsp; Maybe the operation should be running 25% and you have lots of waste. What should your costs be?&amp;nbsp; Do you have problems in your operation of which you are unaware?&amp;nbsp; A very quick and easy calculation of theoretical wine cost gives huge insight into your operation.&amp;nbsp; Theoretical beverage cost is the operation&amp;rsquo;s beverage cost in a perfect world &amp;ndash; a world without over pours, missed comps, bottles not rung up etc. &amp;nbsp;The top 25 items sold by volume will give you a great estimation of where your costs truly lie. Below are the steps to perform this analysis:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Run a sales by volume report in your POS.&amp;nbsp; You want a report that shows the number of items sold (glasses/bottles) and the sales dollar figure for each item.&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Be careful to catch bottle sizes that aren&amp;rsquo;t the standard 750ml.&amp;nbsp; Notice that I put a 1.5L of Gruner in the example.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Place the top 25 items in the excel sheet entering bottle cost, sales price and number sold.&amp;nbsp; (The numbers needed for the calculation are in blue)&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To clarify, you are taking the top 25 items sold, not the top 25 by the glass items and then the top 25 bottle items.&amp;nbsp; The sheet is separated for clarification purposes.&amp;nbsp; I didn&amp;rsquo;t want to write a formula that would be difficult to understand.&amp;nbsp; Out of sheer laziness, I only put 7 items on the list.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Note on the excel sheet the operation sold a bottle of 82 Mouton.&amp;nbsp; For the purposes of the theoretical wine cost, we will leave that out of the calculation, as it will skew the cost unfairly with only 25 items.&amp;nbsp; The impact of this item will be reduced when calculating actual inventory.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the sheet, we calculated a theoretical beverage cost of 26.3%.&amp;nbsp; Pretty good cost for wine.&amp;nbsp; But this, remember is a perfect world scenario.&amp;nbsp; I think a variance of 1.5% either way is acceptable. Remember the 1% rule says that every 1% of sales equals 1% of cost, so that gives the operation about $850 ($5680 X 1% X 1.5) of room. &amp;nbsp;So at the end of the month, the operation should have a cost of 24.8% - 27.8%.&amp;nbsp; Anything higher OR lower should be a red flag.&amp;nbsp; One irresistible temptation is to calculate theoretical cost and see the operation is running much lower than theoretical i.e. 2% or more.&amp;nbsp; Patting yourself on the back and grinning smugly at the kitchen is not a good idea in that circumstance.&amp;nbsp; Most likely there is an error &amp;ndash; missing invoice, over count etc. Remember that any mistake will have a slingshot effect in the next month. Another interesting thing to notice is how much over pouring by even an ounce effects cost.&amp;nbsp; In this scenario, if the bartenders over pour by an ounce every time, cost rises to 29%.&amp;nbsp; Ouch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lastly note that this is also possible for liquor cost, but is a more difficult process depending how you set up your POS items.&amp;nbsp; If anyone is really interested in this I can write about how to do it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may seem like an onerous task, but after the first couple of times, it is an extremely easy and insightful tool for your business.&amp;nbsp; Stop thinking you are doing a good job, instead know you are doing a good job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.guildsomm.com/aggbug?PostID=7082&amp;AppID=178&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><enclosure url="https://www.guildsomm.com/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/01-178-00-00-00-00-70-82/Theorectical-Bev-Cost-Worksheet.xlsx" length="12065" type="application/octet-stream" /><category domain="https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/gregh/archive/tags/Business_2D00_Feature">Business-Feature</category></item></channel></rss>