Despite unseasonal early fall weather reaching into the 90s, our core mission remained intact: drink a lot of Nebbiolo, a quintessential cold-weather wine, and wash it down with some home-cooked osso buco and polenta. Accepted, happily! Winemaker Dan Petroski (Massican, Larkmead), vintner Bob Bressler, and a crew of current and former Napa sommeliers—Jimmy Hayes, Dennis Kelly MS, Sur Lucero MS, Jason Heller MS, and yours truly—got together to taste, spit, gulp, slurp, and work our way through a lengthy flight of wines. The evening presented a rare opportunity: with two four-wine verticals of Bartolo Mascarello Barolo and one three-wine flight of Giuseppe Mascarello "Monprivato" Barolo, we could really drill down on vintage differences and contrast producer styles. (All while enjoying AMAZING wines.) With ETS Labs down the road we had the chance to back up our tasting with some real numbers: Dan ran chemistry panels (about $80 and a couple ounces of wine each) on all the wines, measuring SO2 levels, pH, TA, residual sugar, volatile acidity levels and alcohol. The results—in taste and analysis—raised some interesting questions...
Mascarello vs. Mascarello
It's often the contrasts that provide the best window into a particular producer's style. Tasting through eight vintages of Bartolo Mascarello Barolo was wonderfully illuminating in terms of just how different the individual wines were, but the overall style of Bartolo Mascarello became clearer and easier to comprehend once we started tasting through the Giuseppe Mascarello bottlings.
In TONG Magazine #16 Maria Teresa Mascarello, daughter of the late Bartolo, wrote a really detailed piece on her family's winemaking style. (The following is a summary to get us up to speed.) The Bartolo Mascarello estate produces one Barolo, blended from several vineyards: San Lorenzo, Rué and Cannubi in Barolo, and Rocche dell'Annunziata in La Morra. Maria Teresa stepped into her father's shoes after he died in the middle of the 2005 harvest, and she finished fermentation, aging and bottling in that vintage and has continued to make the wines. Grapes are 100% de-stemmed and fermentation occurs in concrete at ambient temperatures (26-30° C). Fermentations may begin naturally, but in warmer years she may use commercial yeasts to prevent stuck fermentations. Post-fermentation maceration lasts for 30-50 days (and sometimes even longer). The wines are then pressed and racked into large, neutral Slavonian oak casks, where they undergo malolactic fermentation the following spring. The Barolo is typically bottled in July of the third year after harvest and is sold after one additional year of bottle-aging. Given how deeply traditional these techniques are, it is not likely much has changed from father to daughter in the winery. But keep in mind—particularly as you inspect the data—that the '90s wines were made by Bartolo and the '00s wines were made by Maria Teresa. 2005 was the year of transition.
While B. Mascarello's Barolo is a blend of four sites, Giuseppe Mascarello "Monprivato" is an expression of one—a seven-hectare, southwest-facing site in Castiglione Falletto that has been under Mascarello's sole ownership since 1991. Mauro Mascarello, son of Giuseppe, has been making his family's wines since 1967 and is a living legend in the region. The winemaking style here is traditional as well. 30-day-long macerations (reduced from 60 in the old days) and aging in large Slavonian oak casks are the order of the day. Like Bartolo's vineyards, Monprivato is mostly planted with the Lampia clone of Nebbiolo, but there is some Michet as well. Michet is essentially a virused version of Lampia—according to research by ampelographer Dr. Anna Schneider, only 10% of Barolo vineyards planted with Michet are totally free of fan leaf virus. (Giuseppe Mascarello's "super riserva" Cà d'Morissio Barolo is a showcase for the Michet clone plots.)
In broad terms, the Bartolo Mascarello wines were a cut above, with a level of refinement and precision unmatched by Monprivato. Perhaps that's an unfair statement—reflecting differing provenance and sample size—but the Monprivato was "low-toned, all bass," to Sur Lucero, and as a whole the Monprivato flight seemed a little more disjointed, fuller, warmer, and chunkier. The split reflects the classic division: wines from Barolo/La Morra tend to be more perfumed and graceful whereas those from the eastern communes show more power, tannin, and structure.
Tasting a series of back-to-back vintages was an interesting reminder of the way that vintages have recently progressed as pairs in Piedmont, one warmer and the next cooler, and so on.
We took a look at the chemistry reports (below) after tasting the wines, and a few questions came up.
All wines tasted were opened but not decanted five hours prior to tasting. Pricing for both wines is fairly equivalent for current vintages: Rare Wine Co. is selling Monprivato 2009 for $110 and Bartolo Mascarello 2009 for $100. The Bartolo Mascarello wines, long been favorites of Antonio Galloni, took a recent price hike; one at our table suspected this came after Galloni started reviewing CA wines for the Wine Advocate—receiving Parker's "blessing," as it were—and his newly faithful followers started taking a closer look at the critic's older Piedmont reviews.
The 1997 Vintage and Modernist Nebbiolo
Upon its release, US critics anointed the warm 1997 vintage as the best thing ever. This vintage was hot but even, arriving at a time when the vanguard of modernism was sweeping over the Langhe. James Suckling called it "legendary" in 2007, but in shades of Napa Valley 1997 most critics are by now tempering earlier prognoses of greatness with doses of reality. A lot of wines from the vintage aren't showing well—and this may have as much to do with abandonment of traditional techniques and the unfamiliarity of new ones as anything else. We tasted two modern renditions of 1997 Barolo against the classics: Vietti "Lazzarito" and Aldo Conterno "Granbussia." Lazzarito is a 30-hectare cru smack in the middle of Serralunga d'Alba; Vietti is one of six core producers in the vineyard. Dan said it best: "Barrel-aged Manhattan in a wine bottle." It really did smell like a Bourbon cask, as Jason commented, showing vanilla, brown sugar, brandied maraschino cherry, and char on the nose. Faint tannins. (And not necessarily representative of modern Vietti Barolo bottlings.) The Granbussia suffered as well, even as it lacked the obvious new oak overtones of the Lazzarito. Burnished, baked fruit with caramel and loads of VA. Both wines were forward and pleasant, but neither really felt like Nebbiolo. We added two Barbaresco bottlings from 1997 to the mix, both from the 14-hectare Asili cru: Ceretto and Produttori di Barbaresco. The Ceretto "Bricco Asili," a pretty modern rendition, didn't show well—it had some of the most noticeable VA and brett in the group. The Produttori, on the other hand, was an excellent reminder of why this co-op remains one of the best values in the region. It was in a different class altogether—fierce tannins, sustained and lengthy finish, and power without dissolution that shows nimble winemaking in a warmer vintage. The traditionalists won the round for this vintage: B. Mascarello and Produttori "Asili" were the top wines of the flight.
Free SO2: Measurement of SO2 available to bind to other molecules, like oxygen.Total SO2: Measurement of total free and bound SO2.VA: Volatile Acidity, measured in grams per liter. (The US legal limit for volatile acidity in red wines is 1.2 g/l.)TA: Titratable Acidity, measured in g/l of tartaric acid equivalent.RS: Residual Sugar, measured in g/l. Anything under 2 g/l is basically under threshold for anyone.
I discover very little about producer style by sampling a single bottle, but with an arc of vintages in front of me and another producer or several to contrast I can learn a lot in very short order. This tasting was a good reminder.
Overall, we were all a bit surprised by the numbers, particularly alcohol levels in the 1990s Bartolo Mascarello wines. 13.1%?? This could have been a very different tasting had we looked at the numbers beforehand—our perception of VA, acidity, and alcohol did not necessarily match what the numbers were telling us. In other words, the wines with the highest levels of alcohol did not uniformly feel the hottest, nor did wines with the highest TA values always feel the most acidic. VA seemed higher—and certainly perceptible—in a number of wines. It's easy to look at numbers beforehand and taste the numbers—just as other tasters can put words in your mouth (or smells in your nose) when describing a wine. Structural components do not live in a vacuum. "I had difficulty making good correlations between the wines I loved and the chemistry. Some of my favorites (Bartolo '96 and '07) were quite divergent in some of the categories we tested. Which suggests to me—unscientifically—that there will always be great intangibles in wine that cannot be measured." — Jimmy.
This was by and large a tasting focusing on two traditional producers, but the modern 1990s wines tasted here (and elsewhere) did not hold up. Are the recent DOCG aging changes—from 2 years to 18 months in oak for Barolo—a move in the right direction? Such a change seems to favor a "new" modernist perspective, or at least laissez-faire deregulation, but Sur is in favor: "The changes implemented a few years ago allow for a more pristine expression of fruit and a more precise structure." Jason adds: "I'm all for deregulation; it allows those willing to make a fine product to age the wines as they want. The true Barolo producers are going to continue to age for longer periods before release." I'm on the fence, personally. I think reducing time in oak creates something that may very much be Nebbiolo, but it might not be Barolo—isn't that what the Langhe DOC category is for?
Final takeaway? Our lives in the wine world don't suck. Thanks to everyone who generously contributed wines for this incredible tasting! Also, who brought that '61 Gaja? Not in theme, dude!
Sorry that the formatting isn't working out. Hopefully it can be followed.
My tasting group (some who made up members of this original tasting), got together to recreate a part of this tasting again. Dan Petroski had acquired a FOSS machine at Larkmead so we decided to taste the wines to 1. calibrate his machine compared to the ETS numbers 2. Look at a broader spectrum of Maria Teresa's wines then we did the first time around. 3. Enjoy some great wines, because that's what it is all about anyhow (and our group is in the midst of a "year in Piemonte")
Tasted this time were the following wines:
Bartolo Mascarello - 2000, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012
Giuseppe Mascarello Monprivato - 2010
Wine Vintage pH TA VA RS ABV
Bartolo 2012 3.61 6.2 0.74 0.2 14.2
Bartolo 2011 3.66 6.2 0.59 0.5 14.3
Monpriv. 2010 3.65 6 0.54 0.04 14.1
Bartolo 2009 3.61 6.1 0.69 1.35 14.5
Bartolo 2008 3.56 6.4 0.58 0 14.5
Bartolo 2007 3.55 6.3 0.68 1.0 14.8
Bartolo 2006 3.51 6.3 0.84 0 14.1
Bartolo 2005 3.48 6.5 0.82 1.5 14.1
Bartolo 2000 3.63 6.2 0.66 0.8 14.2
Shocking again were the RS levels on the 2009, 2007 and 2005. That is a good deal of sugar in a "dry" red wine.
This is an awesome piece - love the empirical data!
This is a great piece. Educational as well as interesting. Thank you Matt.
I would imagine the effect is a lot like harvesting Sauv. Blanc. in a very warm place like Australia. you pick some early to get acidity, then later to get more ripeness, then later to get more sugar for body then blend together to make an appealing balanced wine.